parler.gallery

Curator’s Note

This specimen is a paradigmatic example of political fundraising that employs a micro-narrative of individual heroism scaled to macro-electoral impact. The three-act structure presents a lone "ballot-chaser" as protagonist, quantifies his output with precision (42 doors, 447 ballots), and extrapolates to organizational necessity. Of particular note is the rhetorical commodification of human effort: donation tiers are explicitly mapped to military-style units (Mike, team, squad, platoon), transforming a monetary transaction into the sponsorship of ground troops. The repeated invocation of "More Mikes" functions as both slogan and structural device, reducing complex electoral strategy to the replicability of a single foot soldier.

Original Specimen

One ballot-chaser can change an election.

View in browser

A Special Message from our Sponsor

Please note that views expressed in this message do not necessarily reflect those of Parler and do not constitute an endorsement or recommendation by Parler.

Turning Point PAC

Patriot,

Last election, one of Charlie Kirk’s full-time ballot-chasers (Mike C.) was assigned to a small neighborhood in a battleground district.

He knocked on 42 doors in one afternoon.

Most people weren’t planning to vote.

Some hadn’t voted in years.

Like all of Charlie’s ballot-chasers, Mike committed to chasing a minimum of 10 ballots every day.

By the end of early voting, Mike had helped bank 447 ballots from that one neighborhood.

Multiply that effort across thousands of ballot-chasers...

...and you understand how elections are won.

Charlie Kirk built this model.

It’s time to get our hands dirty again and scale it.

Turning Point PAC wants to unleash America’s ballot-chasing army (again) in key districts that will keep Republican control of the House and Senate.

Put simply: We need more Mikes.

More Mikes will decide the House.

More Mikes will decide the Senate.

Your contribution DIRECTLY puts more Mikes in the field:

🟢 $50 → Sponsors 1 Mike → 10 ballots/day

🟢 $100 → Sponsors 2 Mikes → 20 ballots/day

🟢 $250 → Powers a team of Mikes → 50 ballots/day

🟢 $500 → Funds a squad of Mikes → 100 ballots/day

🟢 $1,000+ → An entire platoon of Mikes! → 200+ ballots/day

Unlike other political contributions, you know EXACTLY what you’re buying with a contribution to Turning Point PAC.

The only question is:

How much impact do YOU want to have?

REMEMBER: House races are often decided by fewer than 5,000 votes and Senate races by less than 1%.

Your contribution not only CAN make a difference, you WILL make a difference.

Help us win this ground war.

For Charlie,

Tyler Bowyer
Executive DIrector
Turning Point PAC

CONTRIBUTE

Non-Contribution Account (For TPPAC, Inc.’s Expenditures Other Than Direct Contributions to Federal Committees)

As permitted by law, TPPAC, Inc. maintains a non-contribution account for the purpose of influencing federal, state, and local elections. Federal law requires us to use our best efforts to collect and report the name, address, occupation, and employer of individuals whose contribution exceeds $200 in an election cycle. For contributions from federal committees, corporations, and labor unions - regardless of contribution amount - federal law requires us to use our best efforts to collect and report the committee’s name and address. State and local law may require us to collect and report additional information.

Contributions to this account may be used to influence federal elections by making independent expenditures in support of or in opposition to federal candidates. Additionally, in state and local jurisdictions that permit non-individual type (e.g., corporate) contributions directly to candidates and/or committees, contributions to this account may be used for both independent expenditures and direct contributions to candidates and/or committees, as permitted by state and local law.

Individuals, federal committees, corporations, and labor unions may contribute to TPPAC, Inc.’s non-contribution account without limit. Contributions by national banks, foreign nationals (without lawful permanent resident status), and other foreign entities (e.g., foreign corporations) are prohibited. Contributions to TPPAC, Inc.’s non-contribution account are not tax-deductible for federal income tax purposes.

Paid for by Turning Point PAC, Inc. (www.tppac.com) and not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

Paid for by Turning Point PAC

You are receiving this sponsored email because you subscribe to Parler's newsletter. The views in this email do not necessarily reflect those of Parler, its leadership or staff. If you'd prefer not to receive these types of messages on behalf of our sponsors, you can click "Unsubscribe" below.

This email was sent by: Parler
PO Box 60989, Nashville, TN, 37206 US

Privacy Policy

Update Profile Manage Subscriptions Unsubscribe

01rhetorical device
“one of Charlie Kirk’s full-time ballot-chasers”
Constructs a proprietary class of political actor under the Turning Point umbrella, lending institutional gravitas to what is traditionally volunteer canvassing work.
02factual claim
“knocked on 42 doors”
The precise, mundane figure of 42 doors serves as a seemingly documentary detail that grounds the narrative in lived experience while simultaneously elevating routine canvassing to heroic labor.
03rhetorical device
“helped bank 447 ballots”
The banking metaphor reframes voter turnout as an accumulation of assets, consistent with the organization's transactional view of democratic participation.
04sales tactic
“$50 → Sponsors 1 Mike → 10 ballots/day”
This tiered contribution table represents a sophisticated sales_tactic that makes abstract political impact concrete and quantifiable, offering the donor a precise return-on-investment in ballots.
05emotional manipulation
“you know EXACTLY what you’re buying”
Directly addresses donor skepticism by positioning the PAC as a transparent vendor of electoral effort, contrasting with unspecified "other political contributions."
06factual claim
“House races are often decided by fewer than 5,000 votes and Senate races by less than 1%”
Statistical claims designed to create urgency by suggesting that small numbers of ballots—literally the output of a few "Mikes"—can determine national legislative control.
07emotional manipulation
“you WILL make a difference”
The emphatic capitalization transforms possibility into certainty, removing the primary psychological barrier to political giving.
08rhetorical device
“More Mikes will decide the House. More Mikes will decide the Senate.”
Anaphoric repetition of "More Mikes" creates a rhythmic mantra that personalizes the abstract concept of electoral control.